165650351
ˆê¡‚̃nƒG‚É‚àŒÜ•ª‚Ì‘å˜a°E‰ü
[ƒgƒbƒv‚É–ß‚é] [’Êí•\ަ] [ƒAƒ‹ƒoƒ€] [—¯ˆÓŽ–€] [ƒ[ƒhŒŸõ] [‰ß‹ŽƒƒO] [‹Œ‰ß‹ŽƒƒO] [ŠÇ——p]
1: ŽD–yŽsŽYƒnƒG–Ú (1) / 2: –³‘è (6) / 3: é‹Ê‚Ì–Ê”’‚¢ƒnƒG (3) / 4: ¬‚³‚ȃnƒG (3) / 5: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢B (2) / 6: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢ (2) / 7: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢ (2) / 8: ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒuƒgƒ`ƒrƒnƒiƒAƒu—ÞH (3) / 9: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢B (4) / 10: ƒVƒ‰ƒ~ƒoƒG‚Ì’‡ŠÔ‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä (3) / 11: ƒ^ƒPƒmƒRƒ‚ƒOƒŠƒnƒiƒoƒG‚Ì—Y‚Å‚µ‚傤‚© (3) / 12: ƒAƒCƒmƒIƒrƒqƒ‰ƒ^ƒAƒu‚Å‚µ‚傤‚©H (3) / 13: ƒAƒŠƒtƒFƒƒ‚ƒ“‚É‚ ‚‚܂éƒVƒƒKƒlƒRƒoƒGiƒNƒƒRƒoƒGj‰ÈH (2) / 14: ƒgƒQƒnƒlƒoƒG‚ÆŽv‚¢‚«‚â (7) / 15: ƒqƒQƒiƒKƒnƒiƒAƒu‚̈êŽí (6) / 16: ƒnƒlƒIƒŒƒoƒG‰ÈH (3) / 17: ƒRƒ}ƒ_ƒ‰ƒSƒLƒuƒŠŠñ¶ƒoƒG (3) / 18: ƒnƒ}ƒ_ƒ‰ƒ~ƒoƒG‚Ì’‡ŠÔ (3) / 19: ƒcƒ}ƒLƒnƒiƒuƒgƒnƒiƒAƒuH (3) / 20: ‘oãÀ–Ú‚Å‚æ‚낵‚¢‚Å‚µ‚傤‚©H (2) /


[ Žw’èƒRƒƒ“ƒg (No.1559) ‚ÌŠÖ˜AƒXƒŒƒbƒh‚ð•\ަ‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚Ü‚·B ]

–³‘è “ŠeŽÒFXespok “Še“úF2005/08/05(Fri) 18:23 No.1543  ˆø—p 
Image 4

Re: –³‘è “ŠeŽÒFXespok “Še“úF2005/08/05(Fri) 18:24 No.1544  ˆø—p 
Image 5

Re: –³‘è “ŠeŽÒFXespok “Še“úF2005/08/05(Fri) 18:25 No.1545  ˆø—p 
Image 6

Re: –³‘è “ŠeŽÒFXespok “Še“úF2005/08/05(Fri) 18:26 No.1546  ˆø—p 
Image 7

Re: –³‘è “ŠeŽÒFXespok “Še“úF2005/08/05(Fri) 18:31 No.1548  ˆø—p 
Images 5 and 7 are also likely to be Calliphora sp. Whether they are the same or different as 1 and 2 I do not know.

Nr 4 i do not know, I might have already posted it here or diptera.info.

Nr. 6 is a complete mystery and maybe it is not Calliphoridae at all.

Re: –³‘è “ŠeŽÒFƒnƒG’j “Še“úF2005/08/06(Sat) 20:06 No.1553  ˆø—p 
I think,
image 5&7 Calliphora lata = Oh-kurobae
image 4 is Melinda sp.??


Re: –³‘è “ŠeŽÒFXespok “Še“úF2005/08/08(Mon) 19:54 No.1559  ˆø—p 
Maybe image 6 is rather a Tachinidae sp with a relatively short antennae.

ˆ— ‹LŽ–No ˆÃ؃L[

- Joyful Note -
- Antispam Version -