171508083
ˆê¡‚̃nƒG‚É‚àŒÜ•ª‚Ì‘å˜a°E‰ü
[ƒgƒbƒv‚É–ß‚é] [’Êí•\ަ] [ƒAƒ‹ƒoƒ€] [—¯ˆÓŽ–€] [ƒ[ƒhŒŸõ] [‰ß‹ŽƒƒO] [‹Œ‰ß‹ŽƒƒO] [ŠÇ——p]
1: ‘æ18‰ñŠÖ“Œ“¯’è‰ï (0) / 2: ƒ„ƒ}ƒgƒNƒ`ƒuƒgƒƒoƒG‚Å‚æ‚낵‚¢‚Å‚µ‚傤‚©H (2) / 3: ƒqƒƒNƒ`ƒoƒG‰ÈH (2) / 4: “¯’è‚Ì‚¨Šè‚¢2 (3) / 5: ƒnƒ‰ƒ{ƒ\ƒcƒŠƒAƒu‚Ì’‡ŠÔ‚Å‚µ‚傤‚©B (2) / 6: ƒAƒUƒ~ƒPƒuƒJƒ~ƒoƒG‚©ƒtƒWƒAƒUƒ~ƒPƒuƒJƒ~ƒoƒGH (2) / 7: ‚²Šm”F‚ð‚¨Šè‚¢‚µ‚Ü‚· (2) / 8: “ü‰ï‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä (2) / 9: ‚±‚̃nƒG‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä‹³‚¦‚ĉº‚³‚¢ (2) / 10: ‚±‚̃nƒG‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä‹³‚¦‚ĉº‚³‚¢ (3) / 11: ‹³‚¦‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢ (2) / 12: Campylocera‘®‚̃nƒG‚Å‚µ‚傤‚© (2) / 13: “Þ—ÇŒ§‚̃Vƒ}ƒoƒG‰È (3) / 14: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢B (3) / 15: ŽD–yŽsŽYƒnƒG–Ú (1) / 16: –³‘è (6) / 17: é‹Ê‚Ì–Ê”’‚¢ƒnƒG (3) / 18: ¬‚³‚ȃnƒG (3) / 19: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢ (2) / 20: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢ (2) /


[ Žw’èƒRƒƒ“ƒg (No.1466) ‚ÌŠÖ˜AƒXƒŒƒbƒh‚ð•\ަ‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚Ü‚·B ]

Micropezidae or Megamerinidae “ŠeŽÒFxespok “Še“úF2005/07/15(Fri) 21:25 No.1465  ˆø—p 
Is this Micropezidae or Megamerinidae

There is a very similar if not identical fly identified as Texara compressa here

http://moth2001.hp.infoseek.co.jp/5-51.html


Re: Micropezidae or Megamerini... “ŠeŽÒFxespok “Še“úF2005/07/15(Fri) 21:27 No.1466  ˆø—p 
This fly is the same species, but these pictures are from a different location. Again this fly was relatively common in the low hills but only for a week or so.

(I saw it in Kasugayama and Wazuka around mountain streams)


Re: Micropezidae or Megamerini... “ŠeŽÒFƒoƒOƒŠƒbƒ` “Še“úF2005/07/15(Fri) 22:09 No.1470  ˆø—p 
I think it is Megamerinidae species.
Your picture is near M.compressa.This species is common in KANTOU area.
And I here that some Megamerinidae species are living in japan.




Re: Micropezidae or Megamerini... “ŠeŽÒFxespok “Še“úF2005/07/15(Fri) 22:40 No.1473  ˆø—p 
Yes, probably it will be Texara compressa than. I am happy to see a fly in this family, because this is one of the smallest Diptera families in the world, with maybe 10 species or so.

ˆ— ‹LŽ–No ˆÃ؃L[

- Joyful Note -
- Antispam Version -