169200057
ˆê¡‚̃nƒG‚É‚àŒÜ•ª‚Ì‘å˜a°E‰ü
[
ƒgƒbƒv‚É–ß‚é
] [
’Êí•\ަ
] [
ƒAƒ‹ƒoƒ€
] [
—¯ˆÓŽ–€
] [
ƒ[ƒhŒŸõ
] [
‰ß‹ŽƒƒO
] [
‹Œ‰ß‹ŽƒƒO
] [
ŠÇ——p
]
1: ‚±‚̃nƒG‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä‹³‚¦‚ĉº‚³‚¢ (3)
/
2: ‹³‚¦‚Ä‚‚¾‚³‚¢ (2)
/
3: Campylocera‘®‚̃nƒG‚Å‚µ‚傤‚© (2)
/
4: “Þ—ÇŒ§‚̃Vƒ}ƒoƒG‰È (3)
/
5: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚‚¾‚³‚¢B (3)
/
6: ŽD–yŽsŽYƒnƒG–Ú (1)
/
7: –³‘è (6)
/
8: é‹Ê‚Ì–Ê”’‚¢ƒnƒG (3)
/
9: ¬‚³‚ȃnƒG (3)
/
10: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚‚¾‚³‚¢ (2)
/
11: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚‚¾‚³‚¢ (2)
/
12: ƒ‚ƒ‚ƒuƒgƒ`ƒrƒnƒiƒAƒu—ÞH (3)
/
13: –¼‘O‚ð‹³‚¦‚Ä‚‚¾‚³‚¢B (4)
/
14: ƒVƒ‰ƒ~ƒoƒG‚Ì’‡ŠÔ‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä (3)
/
15: ƒ^ƒPƒmƒRƒ‚ƒOƒŠƒnƒiƒoƒG‚Ì—Y‚Å‚µ‚傤‚© (3)
/
16: ƒAƒCƒmƒIƒrƒqƒ‰ƒ^ƒAƒu‚Å‚µ‚傤‚©H (3)
/
17: ƒAƒŠƒtƒFƒƒ‚ƒ“‚É‚ ‚‚܂éƒVƒƒKƒlƒRƒoƒGiƒNƒƒRƒoƒGj‰ÈH (2)
/
18: ƒgƒQƒnƒlƒoƒG‚ÆŽv‚¢‚«‚â (7)
/
19: ƒqƒQƒiƒKƒnƒiƒAƒu‚̈êŽí (6)
/
20: ƒnƒlƒIƒŒƒoƒG‰ÈH (3)
/
[ Žw’èƒRƒƒ“ƒg (No.1047) ‚ÌŠÖ˜AƒXƒŒƒbƒh‚ð•\ަ‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚Ü‚·B ]
Presumed Lauxaniidae
“ŠeŽÒF
Xespok
“Še“úF2005/03/11(Fri) 08:58
No.1041
ˆø—p
I think there are many similar flies, so this one might not be very easy to identify at the species level.
Re: Presumed Lauxaniidae
“ŠeŽÒF
ƒnƒG’j
“Še“úF2005/03/11(Fri) 09:20
No.1047
ˆø—p
IN Japan,We can not identification of Lauxaniidae.
Re: Presumed Lauxaniidae
“ŠeŽÒF
Xespok
“Še“úF2005/03/18(Fri) 22:34
No.1060
ˆø—p
The Lauxaniidae expert from Europe said that this should be Homoneura sp.
Any identification beyond this would be almost impossible even if there would be a specimen available.
ˆ—
C³
íœ
‹LŽ–No
ˆÃ؃L[
-
Joyful Note
-
-
Antispam Version
-